TCR’s strong experience in conducting Remaining Life Assessments
Noteworthy RLA projects undertaken by TCR
Group
Services · Asset Integrity and Engineering Consulting
A thirteen-step turbine workflow runs from visual and dimensional checks through in-situ metallography, natural-frequency testing, and creep-fatigue evaluation. Accelerated creep rupture testing under the Omega Method reads remaining creep life from the actual in-service sample.
TCR Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd., NABL ISO/IEC 17025:2017 accredited in Navi Mumbai, delivers Remaining Life Assessment across boilers, turbines, ammonia tanks and process plant. The group counts 750+ RLA studies, including 400+ boiler RLA assignments worked to IBR guidance with in-situ metallography, NDT, accelerated creep rupture testing and the Omega Method.
RLA is the established workhorse of the Asset Integrity practice. Group cumulative count: 750+ RLA studies across all asset classes, including 400+ Boiler RLA assignments and 6 Ammonia Tank RLA sites covering 10 tanks (CFCL Kota, DFPCL Taloja, Paradeep Phosphates 3 tanks, IFFCO Kandla, IFFCO Kalol 2 tanks, RCF Trombay 2 double-wall double-integrity).
Boiler Tube Leak, metallurgical degradation, creep, erosion, pitting, general corrosion, HTHA, fatigue.
Precise remaining creep life prediction from actual in-service samples per Omega Method.
A desk-based variant of RLA delivered without site visit, NDT, FFS, stress analysis, CFD, or FEA. Methodology: data collection on operating history, GA drawings, and process parameters; literature survey by a multi-disciplinary team of metallurgical, corrosion, and design experts; theoretical life calculation against the design intent and the materials of construction for shells, dished-ends, and nozzles.
Anchor commercial reference: Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited (GFL) Ranjitnagar plant (Survey 16/3, 26, 27, Taluka Ghoghamba, Panchmahals, Gujarat), PO 1251101026 dated 04.06.2025, 124 equipment under scope.
Notore Chemical Industries Plc (Nigeria), Baiji Refinery (Iraq), Godrej Industries, Matix Fertilizers, Nagarjuna Fertilizers, Heavy Water Projects.
Every remaining-life study is scoped to one of two levels of depth, and the level is chosen against the criticality of the component and the data available.
A Level II assessment works from collected history, nominal or measured dimensions, an inspection-grade condition survey, operational or measured temperature and pressure, simple stress calculation, and minimum material properties, with no destructive sampling.
A Level III assessment is the most detailed: measured dimensions throughout, a detailed condition survey, measured operating data, refined stress analysis, and actual material properties from samples removed and tested. The approach is deliberately pragmatic. As much data as possible is gathered on the component history first, often through structured discussion with the plant’s own operating and maintenance people and outside experts, and those opinions are then weighed against the testing and study that follows.
Operators commission RLA against four families of criteria. History-based: thirty to forty years have elapsed, prior-failure statistics point to impending failure, repair frequency makes continued operation uneconomical, or calculation indicates life exhaustion.
Performance-based: a severe loss of efficiency indicating degradation, a large crack showing as leakage, severe vibration or other malfunction, or a catastrophic burst. Inspection-based: dimensional change leading to distortion and altered clearances, or inspection showing microscopic damage, crack initiation, or a large crack approaching critical size.
Destructive-evaluation-based: metallography or mechanical testing on a removed sample shows life exhaustion. The trigger sets the level: a routine age-based review can be Level II, while a component showing crack initiation or sample-confirmed degradation moves to Level III.
On a package or utility boiler each component is worked to a tailored technique set rather than a blanket scan. The drum and the headers carry visual, ultrasonic, magnetic-particle, and liquid-penetrant inspection with dimensional and hardness measurement.
The furnace and second-pass water-wall tubes, the economiser, and the primary and secondary superheaters carry visual inspection, in-situ metallography, destructive sample testing where access allows, dimensional measurement, and, on the hottest circuits, deposit analysis, in-situ oxide-scale thickness measurement, and accelerated creep-rupture testing. Ducts and expansion joints carry visual, liquid-penetrant, and dimensional checks, and special tests cover hanger inspection, alignment, fibroscopy, and finite-element analysis where the geometry warrants it. The reading from all of these resolves into one estimate of remaining safe life with documented evidence of any damage and a recommendation on repair, inspection interval, and life-extension strategy, worked to IBR and ASME guidance.
Representative engagements: Adani Power Mundra, remaining-life assessment of a 660 MW supercritical boiler completed in 25 days; PIC and NBTC, Kuwait, RLA of 120 critical items across an ammonia and urea plant; Petrokemya, RLA of a fire steam-tube boiler; GNFC TDI-II, RLA on reformer tubes; QAFCO, RLA with in-situ metallography on pressure parts.
15 of the 86 published insights tagged to Asset Integrity bear directly on Remaining Life Assessment. The 6 most relevant are below.
Noteworthy RLA projects undertaken by TCR
The practice of remaining life analysis and assessment requires a complex combination of skills, experience and equipment.
Mr. Paresh Haribhakti spoke on Root Cause Failure Investigation and Remaining life assessment of Reformer tubes
IBR calls TCR Advanced a well-known remnant life assessment (RLA) organization
Expert insights on storage tank and silo condition assessment from TCR Advanced's MD Paresh Haribhakti, combining standards with innovation.
Power plant life extension studies by TCR Engineering. ₹238 crore savings for Gujarat plant. India & Saudi Arabia thermal/CCGT units. Call +91…
An RLA establishes how much safe operating life remains in a component and what should be repaired, monitored or replaced. Findings from NDT, in-situ metallography, dimensional survey and, where warranted, destructive testing resolve into one estimate of remaining safe life with a recommendation on repair, inspection interval and life-extension strategy.
Every study is scoped to one of two levels. A Level II assessment works from collected history, nominal or measured dimensions, an inspection-grade condition survey and simple stress calculation, with no destructive sampling. A Level III assessment adds measured dimensions throughout, refined stress analysis and actual material properties from samples removed and tested.
Triggers fall into four families: history-based, such as thirty to forty years elapsed or rising repair frequency; performance-based, such as efficiency loss, leakage or severe vibration; inspection-based, such as distortion or crack initiation; and destructive-evaluation-based, where metallography or mechanical testing on a removed sample shows life exhaustion.
Yes. Theoretical Life Assessment is a desk-based variant delivered without site visit, NDT, FFS, stress analysis, CFD or FEA. It works from operating history, general-arrangement drawings and process parameters, with a multi-disciplinary team calculating theoretical life against the design intent for shells, dished-ends and nozzles.
Each component is worked to a tailored technique set: drums and headers carry visual, ultrasonic, magnetic-particle and liquid-penetrant inspection with hardness measurement, while water walls, economisers and superheaters add in-situ metallography, oxide-scale measurement, deposit analysis and accelerated creep rupture testing, worked to IBR and ASME guidance.